I think the job of an economist, before determining his political affiliation, is to first make sure he can rationalize all political affiliations. Otherwise, he doesn't understand people, or society. It is important that he does understand society, to the extent that anyone can. Here are some of my forays into this worthy exercise.
Why do liberals / progressives consistently demonize rich people and the earning of extraordinary profits, even if the income of most people is rising?
In economic issues, the central component of the progressive platform is force. Force employers to pay people a certain wage or don't hire them at all. Force investment firms into mortgage-backed securities and taxpayers to subsidize the homes of others. Force other taxpayers to pay for the education of my students. Force you to pay for the health care of other people.
However, at the same time people support large government plans to redistribute wealth, they dislike the notion of forcing people to do things. It makes us seem dictatorial. Consequently, they must be convinced that the people they are forcing are immoral, and that is why the very richest of people will usually be seen as corrupt to the progressive party members.
Or, does causation run the other way, and force is the natural consequence of believing the richest among us are corrupt? And let's not deny the possibility that the richest Americans may actually be corrupt (though if they are, does more government solve it, or less?).
- Economic Harmonies by Bastiat
- If Paul Krugman is wrong...
- Why Mercantilism bothered Adam Smith
- If I was a military historian...
- In case my appraisal matters...
- Nations run like businesses
- No one is really religious anymore
- My collection of quotes is better than yours
- Take that, Department of Applied Economics
- Economic Models and Inequality
- Quote on Rent-Seeking and Corporate Tax Rates
- Should Student Loans Be Forgiven?
- Debt-Bondage, Ancient Rome, and the Incentives of ...
- Catherine the Great Convenes Her Empire
- Context-Dependent Preferences in Birds
- I was wrong about posting copyrighted videos
- If only we were still hunters and gatherers...
- Religion First, Then The Plow
- A World Without Conspicuous Consumption
- Two Quotes
- Copyrights Be Damned
- Utopia Documented
- Middle Ground Between Science and Religion
- Inside the mind of a saint
- Jonathan Haidt
- Conversation with my daughter
- Lit agents are ridiculous
- Origin of word "placebo" and placebo quotes
- Straight-A Students Need Not Apply
- The lies of children
- The "tinkering" metaphor
- The Art of Self-Deception
- College Subsidies
- Ayn Rand's Opposite
- Quotes about cities
- Maybe I do understand the EU
- Reasons why most people would call me insane
- I wonder how long...?
- How to be a political pundit
- Vitamins should be banned
- The most devoted medical researcher ever
- A Story of Creativity: how the stethoscope was inv...
- To train an economist...
- The Political Purpose of Debasing Profits
- The Final Destination of OWS
- A Forty Year Plan
- The Truth About Communal Living
- Is Utopia a vegan paradise?
- Thomas More's Utopia
- ▼ December (49)
- ► 2009 (71)