The government is considering another stimulus package to avoid a prolonged recession. I believe that most people believe that when the government gives consumers a rebate to increase spending, people view that rebate as "new" spending.
Yet, ask your students where the money for that rebate check comes from. The check is paid for, of course, by taxpayers. So in a sense, taxpayers are writing themselves a check. How does writing yourself a check for $100 increase spending? You receive $100, but you pay $100. Its not like you now have more money.
The answer has to do with money demand. For the stimulus package to work, the rebate must cause some people to hold onto less money than they would have held without the rebate check. If it works, it works as follows. I am the government and I pay you $100 in a rebate check, and you go out and spend that money on beer and goldfish crackers. To get the money I don't raise your taxes by $100, as that would negate the impact of the crackers. Instead, I borrow the money.
Out in the economy are some people who are savers and have a certain amount of money they are holding onto. To borrow this extra money, I must convince these people to save more, and I do so by offering a higher interest rate. So these people now hold onto less money, because the opportunity cost of holding onto the money (i.e. the interest rate) is now higher. Thus, I induced people who were holding onto money to hold onto less through the higher interest rate. Those savers give up some of the money they were holding, and pass it to you indirectly. You then spent that money and saved the economy.
Thus, if you get a rebate check for $100, not all of that $100 is new spending. Some of it would have been spent by the person the government borrowed the $100 from.
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(155)
-
▼
November
(67)
- 2008 AGEC 4213 Nerd of the Year!
- Trust Me: I'm Good For It
- Encyclopedia of Economic and Business History
- Green Energy
- Interesting Ag Facts
- Interesting Ag Facts
- Explaining Price Indices
- Beef, Pork, Chicken, and Egg Consumption: 1910-2006
- Corn and Gasoline Prices
- The Great Depression - Maybe We Learned Something
- Keynesian Perspective
- With Real Poets, It is Hard To Tell
- Ag Career Info
- Why Neoclassical Theory is Important
- It is more than that...
- Don't Forget...
- King Camp Gillette: Hero of Capitalism
- Gains From Trade...And Love
- The Importance of Insurance
- Oklahoma where the wind comes sweeping down the pl...
- Hereos of Capitalism
- Bird Spectacles
- Farm Animal Welfare: A Rare Statement of Truth
- Turkey Torture
- Explaining "Stimulus Package" to Students
- The Cow Tax
- The Market for Organic Eggs
- For Misplaced Southerners
- The Utility of Positive Emotion
- The Great Depression - We Learned Nothing
- Politically [un]Popular Ethanol
- Food Tales
- An Omnivore's Solution
- Cage Versus Cage Free
- The Cost of Happy Hogs
- The Importance of Economics
- Interesting Ag Facts
- American Socialism
- QLD livestock producers support fine increase
- Why Not Just Say "Farmer"
- The Pitfalls of Organic Food
- The Indifference Principle - In Practice
- Beef Prices in the 80's
- Broom Corn
- I, Broom
- Hello From Detroit
- God is Dead
- Laissez-Faire Higher Ed
- Secretary of Ag Michael Pollan
- The Fatal Conceit
- Steven Horwitz's An Open Letter to my Friends on t...
- We may begin hearing increased support for a bailo...
- Cattle, Hog, and Egg Prices: 1920-2002
- Steinbeck Talks About Food
- Sophistry
- Horrible Ideas
- Thinking About Graduate School?
- Economists Are Brilliant!!!!
- Thinking Like An Economist
- Picking Winners
- An Overview of the Agribusiness Degree
- Financial Crisis and Lending to the Poor
- Becoming a Great Teacher: Part 8
- We are all Socialists (1/3, at least)
- Trading Class Notes
- Humbling the Professor
- A New Approach to M.S. Theses
-
▼
November
(67)